Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fox v. Penzone
as 2:2019cv02681
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jo Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore Fitzhenry v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv00161
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jo Moore Fitzhenry
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rover Pipeline LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11 et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Clay Stubbs, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Stella W. Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Turner v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv00034
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jo Turner
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Snyder v. TransUnion, LLC
as 3:2018cv00441
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jo Snyder
Defendant:
TransUnion, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FIELDS v. INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON
as 1:2018cv00006
Petitioner:
KIMBERLY JO FIELDS
Respondent:
INDIANA WOMEN'S PRISON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nalty v. Krieger et al
as 1:2017cv02205
Plaintiff:
Stephen John Nalty
Defendant:
Marcia Smith Krieger, R. Brooke Jackson, Christine M. Arguello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv02085
Petitioner:
KIMBERLY JO FIELDS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields v. Superintendent
as 1:2017cv00238
Petitioner:
Kimberly Jo Fields
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
