Cases 11 - 20 of 20
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP. v. USA
as 1:2010cv00538
Plaintiff:
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
Defendant:
USA
Movant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
RORKE v. EMPIRE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD et al
as 2:2010cv02202
Plaintiff:
EDMOND RORKE
Defendant:
EMPIRE BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD and L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv02475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Avinash Yadav v. L-3 Communications Corp., et al
as 10-3249
Petitioner:
AVINASH YADAV
Respondent:
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP. and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
v. L-3 Communications Corp et al
as 2:2009cv00368
Defendant:
L-3 Communications Corp, L-3 Communications Welfare Plan, Prudential Retirement Insurance and Annuity Company f/k/a Cigna Life Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SIMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS V AIR FORCE
as 08-1579
Appellant:
L-3 Communications Corp, Link Simulation & Training Division
Appellee:
Michael B. Donley, Secretary of the Air Force
Safenet, Inc. v. L-3 Communications, Corp.
as 1:2008cv06732
Plaintiff:
Safenet, Inc., Safenet, Inc., Safenet, Inc. and others
Defendant:
L-3 Communications, Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. L-3 Communications Corp et al
as 7:2008cv00160
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
L-3 Communications Corp and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dingman v. L-3 Communications Corp. Welfare Plan
as 1:2007cv01131
Plaintiff:
John Dingman
Defendant:
L-3 Communications Corp. Welfare Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
L 3 Comm Corp v. Clevenger, et al
as 04-3869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
L 3 COMMUNICATIONS CORP
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE CLEVENGER, LARRY A. COLANGELO, JOHN C. FLEURY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
