Cases 11 - 20 of 3,939
Amos v. Kalama School District et al
as 3:2024cv05335
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Amos
Defendant:
Kalama School District, Billina Dolezal, Tiffany Fechter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dyda v. Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration et al
as 1:2024cv11147
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Dyda
Defendant:
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Michigan Secretary of State and others
Spilsbury v. Demchok et al
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Spilsbury
Defendant:
Vera Demchok and Carice Demchok
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamon v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65382
Plaintiff:
Lindsay B Hamon
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Martha England, et al v. DENSO International America Inc., et al
as 24-1360
Plaintiff:
MARTHA D. ENGLAND, DUSTIN M. MARTIN and JOSEPHINE THOMAS
Defendant:
DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA INC., BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF DENSO INTERNATIONAL AMERICA, INC., SEIJI MAEDA and others
Duarte v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 24-1387
Plaintiff:
ERIC J. DUARTE
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, WELLPATH LLC, CAROL A. MICI, Commissioner, Department of Correction and others
Skeens v. United Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Lindsay K Skeens
Defendant:
United Healthcare Services, Inc. and Raising Cane's USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
IMGRAM v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ingram
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Adkins v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65292
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Adkins
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
