Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Young et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv07812
Plaintiff:
Lori Young and Frank Young
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv01251
Plaintiff:
Lori Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Stuart Brown et al v. Los Angeles Unified School District
as 2:2012cv01296
Plaintiff:
Stuart Brown and Lori Young
Defendant:
Los Angeles Unified School District
Young v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2012cv00252
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Loris Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Delbert Mosely v. S. Highsmith, et al
as 11-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Delbert Mosely
Defendant - Appellee:
S. K. Highsmith, Dr. , Dentist, MECC, Elizabeth Conley, Dr. , Regional Director, Correctional Medical Services, Ernest Jackson, Dr. , DMD, MS, MCJ, DABFO, CMS and others
Defendant:
Lori Young, Health Services Administrator, MECC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Delbert Mosely v. S. Highsmith, et al
as 08-1431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Delbert Mosely
Defendant - Appellee:
S. K. Highsmith, Dr. , Dentist, Elizabeth Conley, Dr. , Regional Director, Correctional Medical Services, Ernest Jackson, Dr. , DMD, MS, MCJ, DABFO, CMS and others
Walls v. Highsmith et al
as 4:2007cv01897
Plaintiff:
Terry A. Walls
Defendant:
S. K. Highsmith, Earnest Jackson, Gail Wollberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosely v. Highsmith et al
as 4:2007cv01578
Plaintiff:
Delbert Mosely
Defendant:
S. K. Highsmith, Elizabeth Conley, Ernest Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
