Cases 11 - 20 of 756
Badger v. City of Cortland
as 24-1644
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. BADGER, MARCUS A. BENJAMIN, SEAN P. BYRNES and others
Defendant:
CITY OF CORTLAND
TWARDY et al v. OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2024cv01200
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS TWARDY, CLARENCE E. OWENS, FRANCES ROGERS and others
Defendant:
OCWEN FINANCIAL CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING LLC and PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
Marcus Evans v. Lornetta Smith, et al
as 24-1882
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Evans
Defendant:
Lornetta Smith, Sergeant, Varner Unit, ADC, Telicia Mothershed and Marquis Taylor, Corporal, Verner Unit, ADC (Originally named as "M Taylor")
Taylor v. Barriard
as 1:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
William M. Taylor
Defendant:
Terry E. Barriard and Terry E. Barnard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02116
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Taylor v. Oakes et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Daren M Taylor
Defendant:
Stacy Oakes, Michael Parris and Brandon Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Berry v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv10282
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Berry
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Aaron Lewber, Bryan Borowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TAYLOR v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv02405
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ADRAIN M TAYLOR
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
