Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Watkins v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00138
Plaintiff:
Matthew Watkins
Defendant:
J. Thomas, Officer Lewis, Sgt. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00137
Plaintiff:
Michael Mills
Defendant:
J. Thomas, Officer Lewis, Sgt. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00122
Plaintiff:
Christopher Smith
Defendant:
J. Thomas, Officer Lewis, Sgt. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calhoun v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2012cv00204
Plaintiff:
Robert M Calhoun
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Dennis Temple v. Willie Johnson
as 11-6042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS M. TEMPLE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIE JOHNSON, Chief of the City of Geenville Department of Police, BRENDA S. BINNS, Judge, RALPH PUTNAM, Judge and others
Defendant:
GREENVILLE COUNTY and TANIESHA NICOLE WILLIAMS
Calhoun v. Astrue
as 3:2010cv30239
Plaintiff:
Richard M. Calhoun
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
CALHOUN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv03945
Plaintiff:
TINA M. CALHOUN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Temple v. Greenville County et al
as 3:2009cv02655
Plaintiff:
Dennis M Temple
Defendant:
Greenville County, Willie Johnson, Brenda S Binns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Daisy M. Calhoun v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-77973
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Daisy M. Calhoun
CALHOUN v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77973
Plaintiff:
DAISY M. CALHOUN and DAISY M. CALHOUN
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
