Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Sharlow v. Humphrey et al
as 6:2018cv01559
Defendant:
Richard M. Humphrey and Kenan Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Sharlow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jarmaal Smith v. Clark Ducart, et al
as 18-15532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARMAAL SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden, D. MELTON, J. LAWRY and others
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans v. Humphrey et al
as 2:2017cv02411
Plaintiff:
Thrivent Financial for Lutherans
Defendant:
Regina S. Humphrey, Steven M. Humphrey and Carolyn S. Delaney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruco Life Insurance Company v. Ethel Humphrey Irrevocable Trust et al
as 2:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
Pruco Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Ethel Humphrey Irrevocable Trust, Elizabeth Buchler, Janice Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphrey et al v. Stone, Higgs & Drexler, P.C. et al (JRG1)
as 3:2016cv00155
Plaintiff:
Granda P Humphrey and Larry M Humphrey
Defendant:
Stone, Higgs & Drexler, P.C. and Tennessee Adjustment Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Humphrey et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12078
Plaintiff:
Mary M. Humphrey and Cecil D. Humphrey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphrey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02407
Plaintiff:
Georgia M. Humphrey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Humphrey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-27684
Plaintiff:
Georgia M. Humphrey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Humphrey v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27684
Plaintiff:
Georgia M. Humphrey
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01295
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
