Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Allen Thomas v. Robert Baker, et al
as 15-11261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN GLENN THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. BAKER, Law librarian, RONALD C. FOX, Senior Warden, ADAM R. GONZALES, Assistant Warden and others
Thomas v. Baker et al
as 3:2015cv03544
Plaintiff:
Allen Glenn Thomas
Defendant:
Robert E. Baker, Ronald C. Fox, Adam R. Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Brazee et al
as 1:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Elton Zalos Ortiz
Defendant:
Trisha L. Brazee, Veronica A. Ference, Lory L. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odom v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
William M. Odom
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Odom v. Cooley et al
as 3:2013cv00314
Plaintiff:
Terry M. Odom
Defendant:
Kevin Cooley, James McNarmara, Bernard McEovy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Odom v. Trammell
as 6:2012cv00391
Petitioner:
Carl M. Odom
Respondent:
Anita Trammell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Odom v. Pontotoc County District Court
as 6:2011cv00360
Plaintiff:
Carl M. Odom
Respondent:
Justin Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gladney et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2010cv00585
Plaintiff:
Frances Gladney , Jhasmine M. Odom and Aaron L. Odom
Defendant:
Ashley M. Anderson, Safeway Insurance Company and John Does one through five
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SUA Insurance Company v. S&O Investments, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00313
Plaintiff:
SUA Insurance Company
Defendant:
S&O Investments, LLC, Christopher M. Odom, Jonathan S. Shewmake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
