Cases 1 - 10 of 32
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, ADA JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Missaggia v. Spud Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Mark A Missaggia, Kristi L. Missaggia and Mark A. Missaggia
Defendant:
Spud Trucking, LLC, Charles M. Odom and Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Odem v. Odom
as 22-10908
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Frances M. Odom, Unit Property Officer, Kelly M. Brown, Unit Property Officer and Samantha K. Sullivan, AD Review (Investigator 2)
Martin v. Abdullah et al
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray Martin
Defendant:
J Abdullah, B Andrews, B Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Odom v. Solano County Superior Court
as 2:2021cv00487
Petitioner:
Tina M. Odom
Respondent:
Solano County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Odem v. Odom et al
as 1:2020cv00042
Defendant:
Frances M Odom, Samantha K Sullivan and Kelly M Brown
Plaintiff:
Benny Odem, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ODOM v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv12699
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RALPH M ODOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Pruitt et al
as 2:2018cv00161
Defendant:
C Hollister, Smith, Pruitt and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06350
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
