Cases 11 - 20 of 2,563
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv06858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jordan v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jordan
Defendant:
John Doe, Niyombi Marshall, Malik Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACKEY v. MALIK et al
as 2:2024cv02500
Plaintiff:
USHA MACKEY
Defendant:
MANISH MALIK and DEEPTI RAYBAGKAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Justin v. SF State University et al
as 3:2024cv03382
Plaintiff:
Malik M. Justin
Defendant:
Real Options for City Kids and SF State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Justin v. San Francisco State University et al
as 3:2024cv03383
Plaintiff:
Malik M. Justin
Defendant:
San Francisco State University and Real Option for City Kids
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Justin v. Real Option for City Kids et al
as 5:2024cv03387
Plaintiff:
Malik M. Justin
Defendant:
Real Option for City Kids and SF State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Justin v. Real Options for City Kids et al
as 3:2024cv03309
Plaintiff:
Malik M. Justin
Defendant:
Real Options for City Kids and SF State University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BARRATT v. HALL et al
as 2:2024cv02348
Plaintiff:
JAVINE BARRATT
Defendant:
RAHEEN HALL, RASHEEN KNOX and MALIK LIVERPOOL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BENFORD v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
MALIK E. BENFORD
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrion v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03805
Plaintiff:
Gary Carrion
Defendant:
PO Shawn Nicholson, PO Melvin Welch, PO Johnmatthew Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
