Cases 11 - 20 of 20
WEBBER v. KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL INC et al
as 3:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
MARGARET KING WEBBER
Defendant:
KENNEDY INTERNATIONAL INC and THE TJX COMPANIES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13983
Plaintiff:
Margaret King and Robert King
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING-WILSON v. SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM
as 2:2013cv01387
Plaintiff:
MARGARET KING-WILSON
Defendant:
SHARON REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
ALAMO et al v. USA
as 1:2013cv00211
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAMO , EMMETT BRANNEN , WILLIAM BREZENSKI and others
Defendant:
USA
King et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03445
Plaintiff:
William King and Margaret King
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02670
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Margaret King and William King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Margaret King, et al. v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-82661
Plaintiff:
Margaret King
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
KING v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv82661
Plaintiff:
FRED KING, JR and MARGARET KING
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
King vs. Burton, City of, et al.
as 5:2009cv13681
Plaintiff:
Margaret King
Defendant:
Paul Philips and Burton, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
ALLEN et al
as 2:2007cv66367
Plaintiff:
RONALD GENE ALLEN, CATHY ALLEN, BRENDA JOYCE BERRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
