Cases 11 - 20 of 6,479
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Strougo v. RealNetworks Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Barbara Strougo
Defendant:
RealNetworks, Inc., Robert Glaser, Bruce A. Jaffe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
McMahan et al v. Olin Corporation et al (JRG1)
as 1:2024cv00096
Defendant:
Olin Corporation, Lonza Walkersville, Inc., Olin Chlor Alkali Products and others
Plaintiff:
LaMotta McMahan, Mauricio Acevedo, Marilyn B. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bangmon v. Tucker
as 24-40122
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lenez Bangmon
Defendant:
Calvin Tucker, senior warden, Christopher L. Norsworthy, Assistant warden, Michael B. Crow, Assistant Warden and others
William Fuller, et al v. Joe Carollo, et al
as 24-10612
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM O. FULLER and MARTIN A. PINILLA, II
Defendant:
JOE CAROLLO, CITY OF MIAMI, MARIA LUGO and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Kavasutra Delray, LLC et al
as 9:2024cv80145
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Kavasutra Delray, LLC doing business as Kavasutra Kava Bar, Michael B. Klein and Ronald E. VanTassell III
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized publication or use of communications
Williams v. Bishop et al
as 8:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
Xavier T. Williams
Defendant:
Michael B. Bishop, Marcus J. Bailey, Steven D. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peng v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Leon Peng
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Thiele v. Stephenson et al
as 1:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Steve Thiele
Defendant:
Randall L. Stephenson, John T. Stankey, Pascal Desroches and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
