Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Cavazos v. Garilaso et al
as 3:2021cv04330
Plaintiff:
Robert Cavazos
Defendant:
Mr. Garilaso, Mr. Trejo, Mr. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Barney v. Wetzel, et al
as 21-1597
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. KNAPP, Captain, GLASS, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY HEATH BARNEY
NEAL v. PEEPLES et al
as 1:2020cv00192
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD NEAL, JR
Defendant:
DEPUTY WARDEN PEEPLES, LT TRAVIS WRIGHT, MR BARTLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnette v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak
as 4:2020cv01147
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a Amtrak
Plaintiff:
Mr. Roger Allen Burnette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John Alexander v. Bryan Stirling
as 20-6248
Defendant / Appellee:
THE SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KURT STEVENS, Agent Individial and Official Capacities, M. N. BARKER, Disciplinary Hearing Officer Individial and Official Capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOUGLAS ALEXANDER
Rawls et al v. Combined Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01382
Defendant:
Combined Transport, Inc., Mr. Roger Takacs, Roger Takacs and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Russel Rawls, Ms. Diane Rawls, Diane Rawls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bentz v. Graves et al
as 3:2018cv02217
Defendant:
Mr. Bledsoe, Miss Baker, Miss Comitce and others
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Stirling et al
as 4:2018cv03568
Defendant:
M.C.C.I. Commissary, Warden Charles Mitchell Williams, Bryan P. Stirling and others
Plaintiff:
James Walter Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capers v. Sgt. Mr. Rogers et al
as 3:2018cv01159
Defendant:
Lieutenant Mr. Knight and Sgt. Mr. Rogers
Plaintiff:
Carl L. Capers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seward v. Newton et al
as 2:2017cv00172
Plaintiff:
Douglas R. Seward
Defendant:
J L Newton, Mrs. Rogers and Major Flipper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
