Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Dunn Jr. v. Lee
as 5:2022cv00531
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Frank Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Dunn Jr. v. Patterson
as 5:2022cv00532
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Floyd J. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Dunn Jr. v. Holden
as 5:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Kenneth Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dunn Jr. v. Campbell
as 5:2022cv00534
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Kevin Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Dunn Jr. v. Holden
as 5:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Rose Marie Edwards Baker R Dunn Jr.
Defendant:
Betty Faye Brown Holden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lombard v. Baker et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr. and Von Lombard
Defendant:
Darlene Marie Lombard Baker and Keven R. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lombard v. Baker et al
as 4:2022cv02088
Plaintiff:
Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr.
Defendant:
Darlene Marie Lombard Baker and Keven R. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lombard v. Baker et al
as 4:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
Wilton Irvon Lombard, Jr. and Wilton Irvon
Defendant:
Darlene Marie Lombard Baker and Keven R. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Midland National Life Insurance Company v. Villalobos et al
as 1:2022cv01117
Plaintiff:
Midland National Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Antonio Villalobos, Mary Anne Baker, Maria Zambrano Beltran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Loyola v. Baker et al
as 2:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Miguel Loyola
Defendant:
Mary Gordon Baker, Captain Carter, M. Lavorando and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
