Cases 11 - 20 of 884
Drake v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc
as 3:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake
Defendant:
FedEx Ground Package System Inc, Molly Smith, Arthur William Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Berkley et al v. Family Dollar Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00271
Plaintiff:
Dana Berkley, Nina Pallman, Etoya Garrett and others
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores, Inc., Dollar Tree, Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PETZEL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.
as 2:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
DEANE SUE PETZEL and DEANE SUE MEANS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and WARDEN OF THE INDIANA COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PETZEL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
DEANE SUE PETZEL and DEANE SUE MEANS
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Burden (Kelvin Burden)
as 24-202
Defendant:
DAVID 4 BURDEN, ANTHONY BURDEN, WILLIE PREZZIE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
KELVIN BURDEN, Waffle, Uncle and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Caraffa v. Moyer, et al.
as 24-417
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFRED ERIK CARAFFA
Defendant / Appellee:
M. MOYER, correctional officer, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS REHABILITATION AND REENTRY, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Means v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Timothy Means
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Clark, et al
as 24-1015
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
GILLIAN CLARK, MICHAEL HEGARTY, PAUL WIESE and others
Means v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Means
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
