Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Michael Chase Montgomery v. Employees of Victorville California USP
as 5:2020cv00688
Plaintiff:
Michael Chase Montgomery
Defendant:
Employees of Victorville California USP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2019cv04920
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Chase
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acres Bonusing, Inc et al v. Marston et al
as 3:2019cv05418
Defendant:
Lester Marston, Amelia Burroughs, Daniel Stouder and others
Plaintiff:
James Raymond Acres and Acres Bonusing, Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Anderson, Charles v. Wisconsin Dept. of Human Services et al
as 3:2019cv00461
Defendant:
Michael Chase and Wisconsin Dept. of Human Services
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Lothrop
as 2:2018cv02301
Respondent:
William Lothrop
Petitioner:
Michael Chase Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Chase v. Ivan Dietrich, et al
as 17-60709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
IVAN DIETRICH and NORCO CORPORATION
O'Dell Properties, LLC et al v. Equifax, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03618
Plaintiff:
O'Dell Properties, LLC , O'Dell & O'Neal, P.C. , Jelli Donuts, LLC and others
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chase v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00529
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Chase
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Katona v. King County et al
as 2:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Mario Katona
Defendant:
King County , King County Correctional Facility , Jail Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARRON et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2017cv00735
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH L BARRON , JANINE WATTS and TAMMY GODFREY-KHALIL
Defendant:
RICK FUENTES, STEPHEN E RIEFLER, M DILILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
