Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Webster v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv01229
Plaintiff:
Michael Webster
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webster v. Maplehurst Bakeries, LLC
as 3:2018cv00250
Plaintiff:
Michael Webster
Defendant:
Maplehurst Bakeries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02238
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02170
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00260
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas Hayes
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Henry Atencio, Shannon Cluney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2016cv01979
Petitioner:
Michael Webster
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00769
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Michael Webster Valentine, Jr. v. Raymond Madden
as 2:2016cv00975
Respondent:
Raymond Madden
Petitioner:
Michael Webster Valentine , Jr.
Gemstone Foods LLC et al v. AAA Foods Enterprises Inc et al
as 5:2015cv02207
Plaintiff:
Gemstone Foods LLC and RCF LLC
Defendant:
AAA Foods Enterprises Inc , A&M Consulting Firm LLC , Portioning Partners and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Webster et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv25828
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Webster and Michael Webster
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
