Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Cassandra Jones v. MVT Services, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03753
Defendant:
MVT SERVICES, LLC, RENE DAVID MOOT, MVT LEASING, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONES CASSANDRA, C.Z.S and Cassandra Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Moots et al
as 3:2020cv01400
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Washington
Defendant:
Major Carter, Officer Moots and Sgt. Hearing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cornell v. The Village of Clayton et al
as 5:2020cv01283
Defendant:
Joshua David, Sheldon Moot, The Village of Clayton Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
David Cornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOOTE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00903
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN MOOTE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOOTE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv98743
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN MOOTE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Alphen v. Lamanna
as 9:2020cv00249
Petitioner:
Jeanine Van Alphen and Jeanine Van Alphen-Moot
Respondent:
Amy Lamanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams et al v. Moots et al
as 1:2018cv00901
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams and Iesha Williams
Defendant:
Eric Seida, Brett Black, John Looney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan, et al v. Moot Point Secret, Inc., et al
as 2:2016cv05338
Plaintiff:
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Individual Account Plan and Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan
Defendant:
IM Global, LLC and Moot Point Secret, Inc.
Moots v. USA
as 4:2016cv00148
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Moots
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
