Cases 11 - 20 of 38
MacDonald v. Movement Mortgage LLC
as 0:2022cv02633
Plaintiff:
Darren MacDonald
Defendant:
Movement Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Movement Mortgage LLC et al v. Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Movement Mortgage LLC, Justin Wiesert, Isaac Alexander and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lawrence v. Movement Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04160
Plaintiff:
Sherrod Lawrence
Defendant:
Movement Mortgage, LLC, Casey S. Crawford, Laura M. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
JONES v. MOVEMENT MORTGAGE LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00826
Defendant:
MOVEMENT MORTGAGE LLC, SERVICEMAC LLC and DOVENMUEHLE MORTGAGE INC
Plaintiff:
MARIA F JONES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Movement Mortgage, LLC v. MLD Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv08387
Defendant:
MLD Mortgage Inc., Does 1-100, inclusive and MLD Mortgage Inc. doing business as The Money Store
Plaintiff:
Movement Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fowler v. Movement Mortgage, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00481
Plaintiff:
Braython J. Fowler
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper, Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc. and Movement Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02075
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
