Cases 11 - 20 of 41
NIXON v. HARPER et al
as 2:2019cv00602
Defendant:
ORLANDO HARPER, JOHN I DOE, C.O. JACKSON and others
Plaintiff:
MARK A. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Dillion-Pendell et al
as 1:2018cv03737
Defendant:
Klymaxx Lounge & Eatery LLC and Dalia Dillion-Pendell
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hadley v. Pendell et al
as 2:2018cv11584
Plaintiff:
Noel Hadley
Defendant:
T Pendell, M Davis and Lori Gidley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hadley #466892 v. Pendell et al
as 1:2018cv00412
Plaintiff:
Noel Hadley #466892
Defendant:
T. Pendell, M. Davis and Lori Gidley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. VITNER et al
as 2:2018cv01221
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAMS, PATRICIA WILLIAMS and ASHLEY EDMUNDS
Defendant:
JAMES VINTNER, CHAD CASSEL, SCHURR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pendell v. United States Secret Service et al
as 1:2018cv00352
Plaintiff:
Perry Pendell
Defendant:
Kim Campbell and United States Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Pendell v. County of Peoria, Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Peggy A Pendell
Defendant:
County of Peoria, Illinois, John Doe, . McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pendell et al v. City of Peoria et al
as 1:2015cv01271
Plaintiff:
Peggy A Pendell and Jessica M Taylor
Defendant:
City of Peoria, Jim Ardis, City Council Members 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peggy Pendell v. City of Peoria, Illinois, et al
as 14-2158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEGGY A. PENDELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PEORIA, ILLINOIS, JOHN KUNSKI, on behalf of the Department of Inspections, City of Peoria, PRESENTLY UNNAMED CONTRACTOR FOR DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS and others
Abram v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11431
Plaintiff:
Michael Abram
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., Parson, Jane Doe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
