Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plotner v. Mesa County Detention Facility
as 1:2020cv00263
Plaintiff:
John Wesley Plotner
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Lorie Coleman, Naphcare Corporte Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luyster v. Bishop et al
as 3:2018cv06022
Defendant:
Daniel Schaub, Daniel Plotner, Scott Gentry and others
Plaintiff:
Brent Luyster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plotner v. Mesa County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2018cv01988
Plaintiff:
John Plotner
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Mesa County Detention Facility and Correct Care Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLOTNER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv11299
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PLOTNER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plotner v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2017cv02584
Plaintiff:
Aaron W. Plotner
Defendant:
Richard Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDERSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv02943
Plaintiff:
BRENDA J. ANDERSON , SUSAN CHANDLER , EDNA KEYS-CHAVIS and others
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
Brenda J. Anderson , Susan Chandler , Edna Keys-Chavis and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. , Imerys Talc America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abrams, et al. v. Nucor Steel Marion, Inc.
as 3:2015cv02342
Plaintiff:
Michael F Abrams, Jordan Freeman, Joe Cornelius and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Plotner v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv24216
Plaintiff:
Carolyn M. Plotner
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
