Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Russell et al v. HBC Transportation Inc
as 2:2021cv00018
Plaintiff:
Joseph Clint Russell, Mary Jane Russell, James Bradley Russell and others
Defendant:
HBC Transportation Inc and Mursal B Kulmiye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson et al v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00031
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Tulsa County Department of Human Services, Ed Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl M Thompson, Kerry A Thompson and Kaitlyn A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv15500
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huffman v. Dunn et al
as 4:2020cv01293
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officers, Jefferson Dunn, Cedric Specks and others
Plaintiff:
Carrie Jean Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagler v. Heitman et al
as 2:2020cv00973
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Bernard Hagler
Defendant:
Hattie E Williams, Daniel Sturma, Arturo Burgos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SUTHER III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37772
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL JONES SUTHER III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19181
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McNear v. Dunn et al
as 4:2019cv01805
Defendant:
Gwendolyn Givens, Jefferson Dunn, Banks and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio McNear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Russell Jones
as 19-7125
Defendant / Appellant:
RUSSELL JONES, a/k/a Nosebleed, a/k/a Bleed
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
