Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Chase v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al.
as 3:2018cv00364
Plaintiff:
Richard Chase
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Johnathan Ray Ormond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bourguignon v. Chase et al
as 8:2015cv00178
Plaintiff:
Bristout Bourguignon
Defendant:
Richard Chase, Allstate Insurance and Ryan Crosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chase v. Delta Management Associates Inc
as 2:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Richard Chase
Defendant:
Delta Management Associates Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Chase et al v. A Russo Wrecking, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv03327
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Chase and Richard Chase
Defendant:
A Russo Wrecking, Inc., ABM Industries, Inc., ABM Janitorial Northeast, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 40101 Air Trans. Safety and Sys. Stabilization Act
Hurley et al vs. Horizon Air Inc
as 2:2009cv00353
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hurley, Richard Chase, Scott Milburn and others
Defendant:
Horizon Air Inc and Horizon Air Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anglin et al v. Merck & Co Inc
as 2:2008cv01407
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Anglin and Richard Chase Anglin
Defendant:
Merck & Co Inc, Merck & Co Inc and Merck & Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anglin et al v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 2:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Anglin and Richard Chase Anglin
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Middlebrooks v. Richmond County, Georgia Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Gerarde Middlebrooks
Defendant:
Richmond County, Georgia Sheriff's Office, Richard Chase, James Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
