Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2248
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
IN RE: AUSTIN
as 2:2022cv02480
Plaintiff: IN RE: ROBERT AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Anderson et al v. Dooley
as 4:2015cv05120
Plaintiff: Bruce Anderson, John Wilson, Robert Austin and others
Defendant: Diana Dooley and Mark Ghaly
Not Classified By Court: Governor Gavin Newsom
Petitioner: United States of America
Amicus Curiae: California Association of Health Facilities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff: JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Logan Dyjak v. Jo-An Lynn, et al
as 21-3212
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOGAN DYJAK
Defendant / Appellee: DANA WILKERSON, STACEY HORSTMAN, HARVEY DANIELS and others
Matson Navigation Company, Inc. v. Robert Hubbard
as 2:2021cv09091
Plaintiff: Matson Navigation Company, Inc.
Defendant: Robert Hubbard and Robert Austin Ozark Hubbard
AUSTIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56767
Plaintiff: ROBERT AUSTIN
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Logan Dyjak v. Robert Austin, et al
as 21-2022
Defendant / Appellee: ANISSA BAUNACH, ROBERT AUSTIN, DANA WILKERSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: LOGAN DYJAK
Morton v. State of South Carolina We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv01037
Respondent: State of South Carolina
Petitioner: Robert Austin Morton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AUSTIN v. SPRING CITY APARTMENTS et al
as 2:2021cv01335
Defendant: RICHARD SMITH, ALLISON SAUTNER, HORIZON HOUSE INC. SWATHMORE and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?