Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Gill v. Crowe et al
as 1:2015cv01827
Plaintiff:
Edmund Gill
Defendant:
Robert Crowe and Burton Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
David Starr v. E. Holloman, et al
as 15-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David Lee Starr
Defendant - Appellee:
E. Holloman, Ex. Sgt. Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, P. King, CO-1, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Randy Morgan, Warden, Maximum Security Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Crow v. Nunez
as 5:2014cv00007
Plaintiff:
James Robert Crow
Defendant:
Ernesto Nunez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Crowe et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv26211
Plaintiff:
Sandy Michelle Prior Crowe and Robert Crowe
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Continental Business Credit, Inc. v. Schatz
as 7:2013cv00489
Plaintiff:
Continental Business Credit, Inc.
Defendant:
Julie Schatz and Roberts & Crow, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Maylor (Jacqueline Graves)
as 13-2027
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Guillermo Rijo, Donald Parker, AKA Muff, AKA Muffin, Martin McKreith, AKA Unc and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jacqueline Graves, AKA Fat Jack
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dolan v St. Tammany Parish et al
as 2:2012cv02911
Defendant:
St. Tammany Parish , Jack Strain , Robert Crowe and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Dolan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Crowe et al
as 2:2012cv01551
Plaintiff:
Percy Bengamin Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Crowe, Wally Cummins, Demille Topps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Crowe et al
as 2:2012cv01906
Plaintiff:
Percy B. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Crowe, Wally Cummins, Demille Topps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
