Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Aurel v. North Branch Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv03036
Defendant:
North Branch Correctional Institution, Jones, Robert L. Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gallegos v. United States of America, et al
as 5:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
NORA ISABEL LAM GALLEGOS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Janet Napolitano, DAVID V AGUILAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aurel v. Pennington et al
as 1:2014cv01859
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Paul H. Pennington, Stephen Mark, J. Beachay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuffy Associates Corp. v. RLHJR Enterprises, L.L.C., et al
as 13-3069
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TUFFY ASSOCIATES CORP.
Defendant - Appellant:
RLHJR ENTERPRISES, L.L.C. and ROBERT L. HARRIS, JR.
Bird v. Grand Pet Hotel LLC et al
as 2:2012cv01763
Plaintiff:
Paul Lee Bird
Defendant:
Grand Pet Hotel LLC , Robert L Harris and Donna J Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2012cv00938
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Harris
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Escamilla-Vargas v. Napolitano et al
as 5:2012cv00087
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder, Robert L. Harris and others
Petitioner:
Jose Francisco Escamilla-Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv12255
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ailes et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 4:2012cv01822
Plaintiff:
Gwendolan E. Ailes , Timothy A. Bolyard , James E. Dailey and others
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tuffy Associates Corp. v. RLHJR Enterprises, L.L.C. et al
as 3:2011cv02423
Plaintiff:
Tuffy Associates Corp.
Defendant:
RLHJR Enterprises, L.L.C. and Robert L. Harris, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
