Cases 11 - 20 of 587
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
HART v. DAVIS
as 3:2023cv24653
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Brinkema et al
as 1:2023cv01430
Plaintiff:
Jerod L Saunders
Defendant:
Leonie M. Brinkema, Mark S Davis and Fernando Galindo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Gardner v. Lane et al
as 2:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Javon Henry Gardner
Defendant:
Stephen Lane, Norton, S Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13976
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS S DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NICHOLS v. E. JUDDUE et al
as 2:2023cv03157
Plaintiff:
RONELL NICHOLS
Defendant:
E. JUDDUE, O. DWOMOH, S. DAVIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Manship, Sr. v. Kevin McCarthy
as 23-1826
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RENWICK MANSHIP, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN MCCARTHY, Speaker of the House, Congress of the United States of America, KAMALA D. HARRIS, President of the Senate, Congress of the United States of America, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
S. Wellons, et al v. PNS Stores, Inc., et al
as 23-55665
Plaintiff / Appellee:
S. WELLONS, C. ARREDONDO, S. DAVIS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
PNS STORES, INC., a California corporation and BIG LOTS STORES, INC., an Ohio Corporation
Shayla S. Davis et al v. Ahmed M. Adam et al
as 2:2023mc00101
Plaintiff:
Shayla S Davis
Defendant:
Ahmed M Adam and Kal Freight, Inc,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
