Cases 11 - 20 of 360
Strother v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 8:2023cv05956
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc, Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Strother
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv05878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Strother v. Lenoir County Sheriff Office, et al.
as 5:2023ct03320
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Strothers and Robert Lee Strother
Defendant:
Lenoir County Sheriff Office and Lenoir County Emergency Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strother v. MidFirst Bank
as 5:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strother
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Strother v. State Farm Lloyds
as 4:2023cv01076
Plaintiff:
Chrissie Strother
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
STROTHERS v. USA
as 1:2023cv01840
Plaintiff:
LEONIDAS STROTHERS and GABRIEL STROTHERS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petteway et al v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Taveras, Christopher Q. Petteway, Christopher Deveau and others
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Corrections, Craig Washington, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
USA v. Strother
as 23-40471
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Reginald Stanly Strother
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
