Cases 11 - 20 of 230
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv02722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Schlumberger Tech v. Carolina Cslty Ins
as 22-40271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
Carolina Casualty Insurance Company
Simpson v. Schlumberger et al
as 5:2022cv00336
Defendant:
Schlumberger, Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Lizette Bouddhou and others
Plaintiff:
James Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Gilchrist v. Schlumberger
as 22-50257
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John Gilchrist, Byron Brochman and Byron Brockman
Defendant / Appellant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Fibrix, LLC v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
as 1:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Fibrix, LLC
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hamilton v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pension Plan et al
as 8:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Denise Hamilton
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation Pension Plan, Northern Trust Company, ITRON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Badaiki v. Schlumberger Holdings
as 22-20071
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fidelis Johnson Badaiki
Defendant / Appellee:
Schlumberger Holdings Corporation, Schlumberger Limited, Schlumberger Technology Corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv06987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Wilson v. Schlumberger Technology
as 21-1231
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARK WILSON
Defendant / Appellant:
SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
