Cases 11 - 20 of 34
City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System v. Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
as 4:2015cv02404
Plaintiff:
City of Birmingham Firemen's and Policemen's Supplemental Pension System, Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit, IAM National Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P., Gregory L. Armstrong, Al Swanson and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Plains GP Holdings L.P., Harry N. Pefanis, Victor Burk and others
Petitioner:
Inter-Marketing Group USA, Inc., The Pennsylvania State Employees' Retirement System, Houston Municipal Employees Pension System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
IN RE American International Group, Inc Securities Litigation
as 1:2004cv08141
Lead Plaintiff:
Ohio Public Employees Retirement System, Public Employees Retirement Association of New Mexico, State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Feder and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jerome Noll, Stephan Frank, Joseph Scuilla and others
Appellant:
Alan Rothstein, Marisa Rothstein, Mollye Rothstein and others
Petitioner:
THE STATE TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, CUSTODIAN OF THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, MICHIGAN STATE POLICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM, AN, Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, The Reynolds Group and others
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc., Maurice Greenberg, Howard Smith and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
State of New York Attorney General Office and Marshall Orloff
Not Classified By Court:
Margaret B. Amidei, KAREN J MICHAELS, Lee Janovits and others
Interested Party:
Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System
Amicus Curiae:
North American Securties Administrators Association, Inc.
Intervenor:
Jacksonville Police & Fire Pension Fund and James Connolly
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Katherine Harris v. State of North Carolina
as 17-2271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KATHERINE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, NORTH CAROLINA TEACHERS AND STATE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Harris v. State of North Carolina et al
as 3:2017cv00548
Plaintiff:
Katherine Harris
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, North Carolina Teachers and State Employees Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
HARRIS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2017cv00698
Plaintiff:
KATHERINE KWESELL HARRIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ROY COOPER, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: AOL Time Warner Inc. Securities & "ERISA" Litigation
as 1:2002md01500
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Company, Banc of America Securites, LLC and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Minnesota State Board of Investments and The Minnesota State Board of Investment
Plaintiff:
Jason Walsh, Southern California Lathing Industry Pension Fund, Southwest Carpenters Pension Trust and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-30595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Krepps v. NIIT(USA), Inc.
as 1:2013mc00141
Plaintiff:
Matthew B. Krepps
Defendant:
NIIT(USA), Inc.
Miscellaneous_party:
Pennsylvania State Employees' Retirement System
Accident Fund Insurance Company of America et al v. Coyle et al
as 1:2010cv04539
Plaintiff:
The Trustees of Boston College, The Kroger Co. Master Retirement Trust, PSEG Master Retirement Trust and others
Defendant:
Dennis P. Coyle, Leslie J. Gelber, Pete J. Metros and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2012mc80546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
