Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Gomes v. Powell et al
as 1:2012cv00624
Plaintiff: Francisco P. Gomes, Jr.
Defendant: Sandra M. Powell , Rhode Island Department of Human Services , Long Term Care Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Capurso v. Bank & Banking
as 12-2192
Plaintiff - Appellant: Victor Frederick Leo Capurso
Defendant: Wall Street, New York, The U.S. Stock Market & Land Use, Areas, & unauthorized, Land use, areas & disclosures, re: district, newspaper, 10/14/2011, 8/5/2011, &wall street journal the wall street journal & the new york almanac, the almanac of record, wall , Carleon Corporate Mercers or Acquisitions in United States, Post 1950, Since 1995 to current see the World Almanac and Book of Facts Year 2003, Pg 121, Eastern, States, Bank &Banking, Credit Card Association, Credit Cards, Rare, Laws, Regulations & Rules, in current & recent, , for past 1900 of, for 2000 of, since past 1900 of, since 1900 of, all named of and others
Defendant - Appellee: Washington Munial, Seattle, Washington, doing business in State of New York & in State of California in a being aquired by JP Morgan Chase Bank, since 2001, Congress of the United States, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., doing business in States, New York, North Carolina, Virginia, & Utah, & Elsewhere, credit card purchases, interest rate, & minimum, payment, increase as of 11/20/2011 and others
Capurso v. Bank & Banking et al
as 1:2012cv02698
Plaintiff: Victor Frederick Leo Capurso
Defendant: Bank & Banking, U.S., Corporations, Offering Products & Services, to consumers, at all named of Banks & Holding, Companies, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael Rivera, et al v. BIO-Engineered Supplements & N, et al
as 09-56885
Plaintiff - Appellee: MICHAEL RIVERA, individually and on Behald of All Others Similarly Situated and DAN ABELL, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Objector - Appellant: CLAYTON STARNES
Defendant: BIO-ENGINEERED SUPPLEMENTS & NUTRITION, INC., DBA BSN, Inc., a Florida Corporation and CHRISTOPHER FERGUSON, an individual
Movant: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
USA Laboratories, Inc. v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff: USA Laboratories, Inc.
Defendant: Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Michael Rivera, et al v. BIO-Engineered Supplements & N, et al
as 08-80193
Plaintiff - Respondent: MICHAEL RIVERA and DAN ABELL, Individually and on Behalf of Others Similarly Situated
Defendant - Petitioner: BIO-ENGINEERED SUPPLEMENTS & NUTRITION, INC., DBA BSN, Inc. and CHRISTOPHER FERGUSON
IOVATE HEALTH V BIO-ENGINEERED We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1018
Defendant-Appellee: Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc. (d/b/a BSN Inc) and Medical Research Institute
Plaintiff-Appellant: Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. and University of Florida Research Foundation, Inc.
Rivera et al v. Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2007cv01306
Plaintiff: Michael Rivera, Michael Rivera, Dan Abell and others
Defendant: Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition, Inc, Christopher Ferguson and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Long Thanh Nguyen et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 8:2007cv00889
Plaintiff: Long Thanh Nguyen and T&K Baby Nutrition
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, State Of California, WIC Supplemental Nutrition Program and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc v. Medical Research Institute
as 6:2007cv00194
Plaintiff: Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc and Bio-Engineered Supplements & Nutrition Inc
Defendant: Medical Research Institute, Medical Research Institute and Medical Research Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?