Cases 11 - 20 of 143
GREEN v. EDWARDS et al
as 5:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
MONTRELL D GREEN
Defendant:
JONES, T EDWARDS and S MIDDLEBROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 4:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 8:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Larry Klayman v. Neomi Rao, et al
as 21-5269
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Elliott Klayman
Defendant / Appellee:
Neomi Rao, Hon., Robert Leon Wilkins, Hon., Laurence H. Silberman, Hon. and others
KLAYMAN v. RAO et al
as 1:2021cv02473
Plaintiff:
LARRY E. KLAYMAN and LARRY ELLIOT KLAYMAN
Defendant:
NEOMI RAO, ROBERT L. WILKINS, LAURENCE H. SILBERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Price et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv02198
Plaintiff:
Nathan L. Price and Adam M. Komoroski
Defendant:
T. Edward Williams, Francois Peyrot, UNKOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. National HouseCheck Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
National HouseCheck Texas, Inc. and National HouseCheck Corporation
Plaintiff:
Dr. William T. Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: T. Edward Williams
as 21-1101
Respondent:
PATRICK S. LAYNG, United States Trustee for Region 19
Petitioner:
T. EDWARD WILLIAMS
Edwards v. Benchmark Community Bank
as 5:2020cv00591
Plaintiff:
Richard T. Edwards
Defendant:
Benchmark Community Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01176
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
