Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Kasboske et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA et al
as 1:2016cv05129
Plaintiff:
George Kasboske and Hannah Kasboske
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA, Pierce & Associates, Michael T. Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Paul Sapan v. Reliant Support Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2015cv00152
Defendant:
Harald H. Gallob, Jesse T. Mullen and Reliant Support Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Paul Sapan
Tillery v. Jaguar/Land Rover Hilton Head et al
as 9:2014cv02530
Plaintiff:
Joseph F. Tillery
Defendant:
Jaguar/Land Rover Hilton Head, Land Rover North America, Nicholas R. Felix and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Acosta et al
as 4:2013cv00363
Plaintiff:
Philip Noel Johnson
Defendant:
B Acosta, T Snodderly, T Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mullen v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv03751
Plaintiff:
Daniel T Mullen
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
MULLEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv31115
Plaintiff:
HAROLD T. MULLEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Parmer v. Alander et al
as 2:2010cv00611
Plaintiff:
David Earl Parmer
Defendant:
K. Alander, CDC, G. A. Thumser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norsworthy v. Cate, et al
as 2:2009cv02989
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bryan Norsworthy
Defendant:
Mathew Cate, Mike Knowles, Kathleen Dickinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Williams v. Thomas Teodosio, et al
as 09-3081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS TEODOSIO, JANE BOND, SHERRI BEVAN WALSH and others
Williams v. Teodosio et al
as 1:2008cv02716
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
Thomas Teodosio, Jane Bond, Sherri Bevan Walsh and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
