Cases 11 - 20 of 146,695
Tichy et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv03920
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Doralina Tichy, Terry Tiell, Jose Trujillo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Echevarria v. Danvifo Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv03681
Plaintiff:
Juan Echevarria
Defendant:
Danvifo Corp. doing business as Pompei Pizza Restaurant, Vincent Prestigiacomo and Thomas Prestigiacomo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garvin v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02703
Plaintiff:
Thomas Garvin
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morrison v. University of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01222
Plaintiff:
Susan D Morrison
Defendant:
University of Texas, State of Texas, Thomas Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Salinas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01917
Petitioner:
John Thomas Salinas
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ford v. Wormuth
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Ford
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States v. James Thomas
as 24-2032
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Thomas
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Anthony Harris v. County of Cook, et al
as 24-1878
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY HARRIS
Defendant:
COUNTY OF COOK, THOMAS J. DART, LIEUTENANT DELITZ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
