Cases 11 - 20 of 686
Tubbs v. PHH Mortgage Corporatoin et al
as 2:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Andrea Tubbs
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporatoin, U.S. Bank National Association, Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Thomas v. Tubbs et al
as 3:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Douglas Thomas, Jr
Defendant:
Mike Tubbs, Isaac Brown and Trevor Wilhite
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Tubbs et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jawan Garcia
Defendant:
Mike Tubbs, Warden Wilhite, Asst Warden Clack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danyale Tubbs v. Anne Cunningham, et al
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
DANYALE SHARRON TUBBS
Defendant:
ANNE CUNNINGHAM, Registered Dental Hygienist in her individual capacity, CRAIG HARLESS, Dentist in his individual capacity and BEVERLY ANDERSON, Dental Assistant in her individual capacity
Tubbs v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Regina Tubbs
Defendant:
State of Texas, Dover Control Systems, Omni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tubbs-Chandler v. Gallion et al
as 2:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Tubbs-Chandler
Defendant:
Butch Gallion, Autumn Armstrong, Sharon Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUBBS v. DIXON
as 5:2023cv00284
Petitioner:
SHEENA LYNN TUBBS
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Tubbs v. USA
as 3:2023cv01519
Petitioner:
Javaris Marquez Tubbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tubbs v. USA
as 3:2023cv01518
Petitioner:
Javaris Marquez Tubbs
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
