Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Dawson v. Premo et al
as 6:2015cv00568
Petitioner:
Craig Thomas Dawson
Respondent:
Jeff Premo, State Parole Board and Washington County D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAWSON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 2:2015cv00041
Plaintiff:
MARK THOMAS DAWSON
Defendant:
PATRICIA FISCHER, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and STATE OF INDIANA
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Benny Abucejo v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05666
Plaintiff:
Benny Abucejo, Mario Aguilar, Phillip Alaniz, Jr. and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Dawson v. Premo et al
as 6:2014cv01100
Petitioner:
Craig Thomas Dawson
Respondent:
Oregon State Penn and Supt. Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hanners v. The City of Auburn, Alabama et al
as 2:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Justin Hanners
Defendant:
The City of Auburn, Alabama , Thomas Dawson and Charles Duggan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanners v. The City of Auburn, Alabama et al
as 3:2013cv00735
Plaintiff:
Justin Hanners
Defendant:
The City of Auburn, Alabama , Thomas Dawson and Charles Duggan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawson v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.)
as 1:2013cv22429
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dawson
Defendant:
Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S.)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Dawson v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00201
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dawson
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC and US Reconstruction LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dawson v. Biomet, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00146
Plaintiff:
Thomas Dawson
Defendant:
Biomet, Inc., Biomet Orthopedics, LLC and U.S Reconstruction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Craig Dawson v. Brian Belleque
as 12-35569
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS DAWSON
Respondent - Appellee:
BRIAN BELLEQUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
