Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Building Service 32BJ Health Fund v. Triple Canopy Inc., A Constellis Company
as 1:2023cv01933
Plaintiff:
Building Service 32BJ Health Fund
Defendant:
Triple Canopy Inc., A Constellis Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1131 ERISA - Collection of Delinquent Trust Fun
Buckner et al v. Triple Canopy, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Buckner, Ben Docena, Carlos Collier and others
Defendant:
Triple Canopy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Mateega v. Department of the Army et al
as 1:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Philip Mateega
Defendant:
Department of the Army, Department of State A/OPE/AQM, Triple Canopy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bunch v. DOWCP
as 22-60637
Petitioner:
Hal Bunch
Respondent:
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Triple Canopy and Allied World National Assurance Company, c/o Broadspire
Chris Franks v. Triple Canopy, Inc.
as 22-1881
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRIS E. FRANKS
Defendant / Appellee:
TRIPLE CANOPY, INC., CONSTELLIS, LLC, CAPTAIN JUSTIN GOOD, in his official capacity and others
BUTTERFIELD v. TRIPLE CANOPY INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03144
Plaintiff:
DE'SEAN LAMAR BUTTERFIELD
Defendant:
TRIPLE CANOPY INC. and ALEX MILLER
Triple Canopy, Inc. v. UGSOA Local 206 Union
as 1:2022cv00659
Petitioner:
Triple Canopy, Inc.
Respondent:
UGSOA Local 206 Union
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
