Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Isaac Hudson, Jr. v. TDCJ, et al
as 20-20059
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT AYERS, TDCJ, FRAIZER, TDCJ, CAPTAIN WATKINS, Grievance Operations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC HUDSON, JR.
Hudson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Captain Adewa, Captain Watkins, Officer Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Hudson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04970
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2019cv00131
Defendant:
JANE DOE, SHAWN EMMONS, SHROPSHIRE and others
Plaintiff:
QUAYSHAUN V ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2019cv02541
Respondent:
Captain Adewa, Office Board, T. CoIII and others
Petitioner:
Isaac Hudson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MITCHELL v. OAKES et al
as 3:2019cv00309
Defendant:
D KIRK, B OAKES, C PRATT and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC SAMUWELL MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tremaine Bailey v. J. Soto et al
as 2:2018cv08653
Defendant:
J. A. Zamora, A. Martinez, P. M. Carranza and others
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cirrus Education, Inc., et al v. Christopher Adams, et al
as 17-56741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CIRRUS EDUCATION, INC., a corporation, CIRRUS BEIJING CORP., a corporation, CIRRUS LTD., a corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER M. ADAMS, DAVID V. ADAMS, trustee of the Christopher Adams Trust, DVA, INC., a corporation and others
Adams v. Hunt et al
as 4:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah V Adams
Defendant:
James J Hunt and Ozmer Lee Oxendine Jr Farm LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
