Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00745
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Irwin v. Does et al
as 1:2018cv11972
Plaintiff:
Ronald Irwin
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Anthony Wickersham, David Viviano and others
IZ Ranch, LLC et al v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv01208
Plaintiff:
IZ Ranch, LLC, Michael D. Nelson and Wendy H. Nelson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ronald Irwin v. John Doe, et al
as 16-2413
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD IRWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, Cheyboygan County Prosecutor's Office and Sheriff's Department, Cheyboygan County District Court/Circuit Court Judges, Warren Police Department, etc., NICHOLAS V. HILE and others
Fisher v. Tice
as 16-3234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Elizabeth Fisher and Wendy H. Krivit
Defendant - Appellee:
Cynthia Tice
Intervenor:
Rob's Really Good LLC
Ronald Irwin v. John Doe, et al
as 16-1813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD IRWIN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, Cheyboygan County Prosecutor's Office and Sheriff's Department, Cheyboygan County District Court/Circuit Court Judges, Warren Police Department, etc., NICHOLAS V. HILE and others
Fernandes v. Landrum et al
as 1:2016cv10816
Plaintiff:
William M. Fernandes
Defendant:
Timothy J. Landrum , Briane M. Grey , William M. Czopek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Irwin v. Doe et al
as 2:2015cv14471
Plaintiff:
Ronald Irwin
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, Nicholas V. Hile and others
Araya Henok v. Wendy Schwartz, et al
as 15-7022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Araya Henok
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Schwartz and Wendy H. Schwartz and Associates, PLLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
