Cases 11 - 20 of 191
HAYS v. WITTMAN et al
as 3:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYS
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITTMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03818
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WITTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ADKINS et al v 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
TODD ADKINS, TEMITOPE AMUSA, JULIO AVILA and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Adkins et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02641
Plaintiff:
Todd Adkins, Temitope Amusa, Julio Avila and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Fantel v. White et al
as 2:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
Julia White, Scott Nieman, Dean Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koler et al v. Wittman
as 5:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Tina Koler, Joseph Koler and Carissa Koler
Defendant:
Melissa A. Wittman
Interested Party:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
WITTMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11935
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WITTMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HAYS v. WITTMAN et al
as 1:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYS
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAYS v. WITTMAN et al
as 1:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
DE'RECO D. HAYS
Defendant:
WITTMAN, SIMPSON, I.D.O.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
