Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Watkins v. City of Oakland et al
as 3:2017cv06002
Plaintiff:
Shelley Watkins
Defendant:
City of Oakland , Sabrina Landreth , William Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William White v. William Berger, Sr., et al
as 17-13767
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BERGER, SR., ERIC THOMPSON, DONALD ESLINGER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BERGER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv03650
Petitioner:
WILLIAM BERGER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
William White v. William Berger, Sr., et al
as 16-11606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. WHITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM BERGER, SR., ERIC THOMPSON, DONALD ESLINGER and others
WHATLEY v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2015cv01450
Defendant:
DANIEL BATES, WILLIAM BERGER, TANESHA CREAR and others
Plaintiff:
WALKER WHATLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Eslinger et al
as 6:2014cv00936
Plaintiff:
William A. White
Defendant:
William Berger, Sr., Eric Thompson, Donald Eslinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUNDHOLM v. ESUITES HOTELS, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01996
Plaintiff:
MICAELA SUNDHOLM
Defendant:
ESUITES HOTELS, LLC, KEVIN E. CLINE, DAVID WILLIAM BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Worrall, et al v. Home Defense Law Offices, LLC, et al
as 14-1012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CECILE WORRALL and J. KIRK WORRALL, III
Defendant - Appellee:
HOME DEFENSE LAW OFFICES, LLC and LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM BERGER, ESQ.
Defendant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC
Intervenor:
FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as Conservator of Fannie Mae
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
