Cases 11 - 20 of 122
The State of Texas v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 6:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service, Department of the Treasury, Daniel Werfel and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55262
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Woolfolk v. Holiman et al
as 4:2022cv01268
Plaintiff:
Torrey Valone Woolfolk
Defendant:
James Tyler Holiman, Kim Doney, Robert Wakefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Diamond Pharmacy Services et al
as 3:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Antonio Saunders
Defendant:
Diamond Pharmacy Services, Lupin Pharm. Corp, Novartis Pharm. Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolfolk v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04036
Plaintiff:
Carla Woolfolk
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Woolfolk v. The State of New York
as 9:2022cv00852
Plaintiff:
Elias Woolfolk
Defendant:
The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perez v. Ransome et al
as 1:2022cv01087
Plaintiff:
Francisco Perez
Defendant:
Superintendent Kevin Ransome, SCI Dallas Medical Department, Bureau of Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolfolk v. GEICO
as 3:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Woolfolk
Defendant:
GEICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
