Cases 11 - 20 of 3,901
Yang v. IHeartMedia, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
IHeartMedia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Merch Traffic, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv02795
Plaintiff:
Merch Traffic, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, a can can, A2W9XFVNA5QZ8T and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Yang v. Merchants Hospitality, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04125
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yang
Defendant:
Merchants Hospitality, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Yang et al v. DeRiggi
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Wang Pin Kuan Yang and The Wang Pin Kuan Yang Trust of Chicago
Defendant:
Louis DeRiggi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Bialic v. Enphase Energy, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv03216
Plaintiff:
Mark Bialic
Defendant:
Enphase Energy, Inc., Badrinarayanan Kothandaraman and Mandy Yang
Yang v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv04423
Plaintiff:
Minwon Yang
Defendant:
Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Palmer v. City of Daytona Beach et al
as 6:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Keriekan Palmer
Defendant:
City of Daytona Beach, Travis Barrett, Collin Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
