Cases filed in Oregon matching "Tisdale"
Cases 11 - 20 of 1,208
Konecny v. Johnson, et al
as 24-1092
Plaintiff: J. ALAN KONECNY, AKA Alan J. Konecny
Defendant: KIMBERLY C. PRIEST JOHNSON, CHRISTINE A. NOWAK, SEAN D. JORDAN and others
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff: IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant: T.A. WEAVIL, DANNY ROGERS, VERONICA L. EDMINSTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00213
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Tisdale v. Bayer Corporation
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff: Achorea Tisdale
Defendant: Bayer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diogu v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff: Diogu Kalu Diogu, II
Defendant: Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Seana Willing, Amanda M. Kates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barber v. Practive Health, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff: Peter J. Barber
Defendant: Practive Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
TISDALE v. BAYER CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv00284
Plaintiff: ACHOREA TISDALE
Defendant: Bayer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Tisdale v. Bayer Corporation
as 1:2024cv00284
Plaintiff: Achorea Tisdale
Defendant: Bayer Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Konecny (PS) v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff: J. Alan Konecny
Defendant: Kimberly C Priest Johnson, Christine A Nowak, Sean D. Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?