Cases 21 - 30 of 20,869
Shields v. Port Arthur Independent School District et al
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robin Dennis Perry Shields
Defendant:
Port Arthur Independent School District, Mark Porterie and Monique Bienvenue
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Shields et al v. Port Arthur Independent School District et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Robin Dennis Perry Shields and Corrections Officer JOHN DOE ONE
Defendant:
Port Arthur Independent School District, Mark Porterie and Monique Bienvenue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
US v. Arthur Jones
as 24-6462
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ARTHUR F. JONES, a/k/a Arthur Palmer, a/k/a June, a/k/a Junior
Taylor v. Gordan, et al.
as 24-3049
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR TAYLOR
Defendant:
GORDAN, C/O- Retaliation, D. ECUENA, Warden (A), KANCTLL, Lieutenant and others
Singleton v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Arthur Singleton
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Daniel Duran v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv03919
Plaintiff:
Daniel Duran
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Arthur Contreras and Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Heun
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones and Abdul Haseeb Ibu Jones Bey
Defendant:
Arthur "Art" Heun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 2:2024cv01956
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and POLK, SHEER & PROBER LAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
