Cases 21 - 30 of 429
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Rice v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Creech Rice
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Creech v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2023pq00990
Plaintiff:
James Creech
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Greg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Thacker v. Abott et al
as 4:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
David Kent Thacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Gregg Abott, Ken Paxton, Lisa McMinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00348
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Glass v. Creech
as 1:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Beverly Creech
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
CREECH v. XENAKIS et al
as 3:2022cv06518
Plaintiff:
IMANI CREECH
Defendant:
GEORGE XENAKIS, MARY M. MCCUDDEN, NAWAL S. CHAUDRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott Creech v. Tim Shoop
as 22-3918
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTT DAVID CREECH
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM SHOOP, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
