Cases 21 - 30 of 26,457
County of Suffolk et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2024cv03498
Plaintiff:
County of Suffolk and OptumInsight, Inc
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Sheriff, Jefferson County
as 1:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Sheriff, Jefferson County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Stephens
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Baker
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. LIFECELL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2024cv05986
Plaintiff:
PAMELA BAKER
Defendant:
LIFECELL CORPORATION and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Baker v. USA
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner:
Andre Maurice Baker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Baker v. Jefferson County Sheriff
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. The United States
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Mae Alice Baker
Defendant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
May v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Herbert May
Defendant:
Calhoun, County of, Kurtis Cunkle, Sterling Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Anthony Wills, Officer Baker and Lance Korando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
