Cases 21 - 30 of 136
DENNEHY v. WHITE et al
as 3:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DENNEHY
Defendant:
ROBERT J. WHITE, JR., NASHAAT ESTAFANOUS and NABIL ESTAFANOUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
CIOTTI et al v. MEADOWLANDS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2016cv09533
Plaintiff:
MARIA CIOTTI , DOROTA JANCZAK , NEBIS DIAZ and others
Defendant:
MEADOWLANDS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER and MEADOWLANDS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER HEALTH & WELFARE BENEFITS PROGRAM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Rene Alvarez, et al v. USA
as 16-16479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENE ALVAREZ, SIMONE ALVAREZ, ANTHONY ANGLADA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chris Jaye v. Oak Knoll Village Condominium, et al
as 16-2515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRIS ANN JAYE
Defendant - Appellee:
OAK KNOLL VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOC INC, STEPHENSON & ASSOCIATES, its agents and assigns, MAINTENANCE SOLUTIONS INC., its agents and assigns and others
Feng v. Burke, Dennehy & Company, P.C. et al
as 1:2015cv13170
Plaintiff:
Kristi Feng
Defendant:
Burke, Dennehy & Company, P.C. , James L. Burke , James L Burke, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. U.A.P.D., The et al
as 4:2015cv01765
Plaintiff:
Jorge Antonio Perez
Defendant:
U.A.P.D., The, S.E.I.U., The, A.F.S.C.M.E., The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Dennehy, et al.
as 2:2015cv00833
Plaintiff:
Jorge Antonio Perez
Defendant:
A. Dennehy, D. Hamad, Kamala D. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibbs v. Dennehy et al
as 2:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gibbs
Defendant:
A. Dennehy, D Hamad and Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goods v. McCumber, et al.
as 2:2014cv02580
Plaintiff:
Gregory Goods
Defendant:
Jeffery McCumber, D. Hamad, P. Kemp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
