Cases 21 - 30 of 577
Wren v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
James David Wren
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Hines v. Jenkins et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jamie Hines
Defendant:
Ofc. William Jenkins, Sgt. Christopher Dale Robinson, Ofc. Josh Adam Hopper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Donnie Wren
as 23-3197
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Donnie Duane Wren
Kah Hospice Company Inc v. Chambers et al
as 2:2023cv05195
Plaintiff:
Kah Hospice Company Inc doing business as Gentiva
Defendant:
Sommer Chambers, Catherine Zarrillo and Wren Hospice LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
WREN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01705
Petitioner:
JEWEL WREN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
WREN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09685
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER Z WREN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Durso et al v. Andover Subacute & Rehabilitation
as 1:2023cv06773
Plaintiff:
John R. Durso, Joseph Fontano, Neil Gonzalvo and others
Defendant:
Andover Subacute & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
