Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Eric Watkins v. Jesup FCI Chain of Command, et al
as 14-11307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
JESUP FCI CHAIN OF COMMAND, and officers and correctional officers, ANTHONY HAYES, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, D. HUDSON, Associate Warden; in his individual and official capacity and others
Hayes v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2014cv00129
Plaintiff:
Gerald Anthony Hayes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Carlie Spiers, et al v. GlaxoSmithKline
as 13-80197
Plaintiff - Respondent:
CARLIE SPIERS, SANDRA WALKER, EVELYN WYATT and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, AKA SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Hayes v. Sepanek
as 0:2013cv00104
Petitioner:
Robert Anthony Hayes
Respondent:
Michael Sepanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spiers et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03046
Plaintiff:
Carlie Spiers , Sandra Walker , Evelyn Wyatt and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Finley v. Cross
as 2:2013cv00016
Petitioner:
Thomas Finley
Respondent:
Anthony Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Crawford v. USA et al
as 2:2012cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lamar Crawford
Defendant:
USA and Anthony Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Reeves v. Koster, et al
as 4:2012cv02185
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Reeves
Defendant:
Anthony Hayes and Chris Koster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reeves v. Hayes
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Reeves
Defendant:
Anthony Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wilson Gorrell v. Warden
as 12-13322
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILSON GORRELL
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HAYES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
